Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Kurdistan Region Needs Good Journalists as Much as Good Politicians 


By Salman Ahmed Rasul


Kurdish security forces attack demonstrators and journalists in Sulaimaniyah, Kurdistan region of Iraq. April 18. 2011. Photo credit: Haedar Omar


Kurdistan region needs responsible and professional journalists as much as they need expert politicians. On the one hand, it is moral and everybody’s duty here is to endorse the region, especially the journalists and writers who cover and demonstrate the region for the international community. On the other hand, when they see something wrong, they do not have to be neither silent nor exaggerated. They should be objective, critical, unbiased, separating opinion from news, and tell the truth to avoid misunderstanding in order to have ethical standards.


I want to share one of my personal experiences in journalism here to keep my “nut graph” simple and more clear to make a point. I published an article on UPIU on December 1, 2011 which was published on some other websites later as well. I mentioned Kurdistan region as a safe haven of Iraq in this article that so many foreigners, including international experts can travel only to one spot of the country without concern about the security issues. This is why the New York Times listed Kurdistan as one of the top 41 places to travel around the world on Jan 9, 2011!A short time after I published my story, a very professional American journalist in almost every sense of journalism in Washington D.C. criticized me that I am promoting and advertising Kurdistan. She told me that the first paragraph of my story veers into public relations territory. It reads more like a brochure advertising Kurdistan than a news story.

She also said, “Yes, it is news that The New York Times touted the region as a top place to travel, but do not allow that to mar your news story. Focus on the news, not on promoting Kurdistan. The reality of the situation on its own is enough of an argument that the region is safe to visit!” I whole-heartedly agree that she is right, but as a matter of fact, generally I realized that this is the nature of the Kurds as the largest stateless nation in the world without an independent country in the process of recovering and serving their only Kurdish autonomous territory who are very patriotic and nationalistic due to facing a lot of genocide, massacre, horrific events and barbarism throughout history, especially during 1980s under Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Quite frankly, I found out for myself when I wrote the first paragraph of my story, I was in a position where I had to make a choice between two good things: either a positive Kurdish patriotic or a professional journalist which is a kind of tough decision to implement. My point is you have unequivocally the right to affiliate with any political party you want. You have the right to support your political background and protect all of your identities. You have the right to express your feelings for your own country and to be in sympathy with its legacies, accomplishments, and glories, but if you want to be a professional journalist, this is a different story.

If we analyze the recent riots in Badinan as an example that is covered by the local media on a massive scale, we easily recognize that the local media is not professional. 2011 was the period of transition, full of unforeseen situations, events, untold incidents and devastations in the Middle East. The Kurdistan region of Iraq also faced some of the transitions. In the very beginning of the last month of 2011, a group of young people who were led by a handful of preachers rioted in a protest right after Friday noon prayers on December 2 in Zakho. They attacked and burnt some hotels,
www.ekurd.net alcohol stores and a massage parlor. In the evening, the headquarters of Kurdistan Islamic Union (KIU) in Duhok and its offices in Zakho and in some other districts around were burnt as well. Some people compared this internal unrest with London riots. This violent incident became one of the major events that brought a serious widespread local media attention in 2011. It was covered by the media in variety of viewpoints due to the influence of political affiliations over media, journalists, and political analysts.

There are various interpretations such as misinterpretations, possible assumptions, and fair understanding of the event. Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) has claimed that it has been instigated primarily by members and supporters of KIU, and KIU replied that what KDP has said in the media is a fabricated legend, and in fact, it is an implausible scenario by KDP and denied all the theoretical and practical implication of their supporters among the rioters.

The good thing is no one was killed. KDP can tackle all the crises financially and reimburse KIU easily similar to identical incident in 2005 for the cost of their offices and communications departments. They can also reimburse these people, who lost their properties, but the solution is not money because the cost is not only money. The bad thing is such an event could damage the region’s reputation internationally.

Emphasizing on condemning such an action by both the authorities and public opinion and revealing who was responsible is essential, but even the more underlying strategic aim should focus more on the image of the Kurdistan region abroad. The U.S. State Department tells American tourists to be cautious not to visit Iraq due to security issues, but according to the British foreign policy, Kurdistan is an outstanding spot. "While the State Department continues to warn American tourists to avoid Iraq entirely, the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office says the Kurdistan region is an exception," wrote The New York Times.“ Safety, history and a warm welcome in a stable corner of Iraq.” CNN also on its recent report that indicted the developments of the region defined Kurdistan as the other Iraq, safe, peaceful, and stable. These are all a testament to the safety of the Kurdistan region. I do not want to make the same mistake here to advertise Kurdistan, but I have to provide evidence to verify the information, and despite the existence of corruption, the absence of deep transparency in the executive power, and deficiency in the judiciary and the legislative branch, but those undeniable proofs show the image of the stable region abroad that every individual is responsible to shield it from such a harmful riot.

The Kurdish authority has an incredible opportunity to elevate to a better image. They have to make more efforts to improve and add positive things on the image, and they have to strive to protect the image of that kind of prosperous region. As Michael Rubin mentioned in his article on the incident that KRG’s representatives abroad are more aware of the region’s reputation more than local senior officials. “The Kurdish representative realized more than those on Sar-e Rash the damage it could do to the region’s image abroad.” He wrote. Therefore, their priority should be protecting the image first, and then build on what they have started and achieved since the Kurdish uprising of 1991 because if they cannot protect the image, they will not be able to move forward. This will defiantly be damaging to the process of reconstruction of the region.

Journalists are responsible as much as politicians. There are always two sides to a story. The journalists should not polish their stories and perspectives for the sake of their political affiliations. Professional journalists are those who can think not only the corner, but around the corner as well, those who think and check the facts not only inside the box, but also outside the box wisely.

Stability is an achievement that is different in the region from the other parts of Iraq. It has been a rescued place for high Iraqi opposition leaders since 1990s when the Iraqi opposition parties were based in Kurdistan, and currently, it is becoming a safe haven for Sunni leaders such as Vice President Tareq al Hashemi and Deputy Prime Minister Saleh Mutlaq. Journalists, politicians and even common people can promote and show the stability as a weapon to attract international companies to invest in the region. 



This article first appeared on ekurd.net

Americans Enjoy New Life and Experiences in a Safe Haven in Iraqi Kurdistan 



By Salman Ahmed Rasul


                                 U.S. Ambassador Christopher R. Hill gives a speech at AUIS


SULAIMANIYAH, Kurdistan region 'Iraq', —  A lot of people outside of Iraq, especially in the United States and Europe hear about violence in Iraq a lot, but they do not know that there is an autonomous region (Iraqi Kurdistan) in northern Iraq, which is known as a “safe haven” not only for people from the middle and south of Iraq such as Christian minority, but also for foreigners and tourists. They do not know that Iraq in general and Kurdish region in particular has been developed since the liberation of Iraq in 2003 in terms of security, political life, economy, democracy and education. Iraqi Kurdistan is one of the 41 places to go in 2011, according to a report in the New York Times’ travel section in January, 2011. 
They are not familiar with the differences of this most stable region with the other parts of the country.

The American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS) opened in 2007 in the city of Sulaimaniyah in the Kurdistan region. This university is one of a massive development of the education system in Iraq where students from different ethnic groups, religions, and political backgrounds can study, play football and basketball, and live together. AUIS students managed several demonstrations to support democracy, freedom, and particularly to the recent Middle East revolutions. It is the first and only liberal arts education and accredited institution across the country.

American professors enjoy teaching Iraqi students and living in a place without concern about the safety of the region. Our American history professor has said that he has felt safer here than when he was in the U.S. Last spring, I met David Clough, a Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Colorado in Boulder at AUIS, and he told me that when people found he was coming here, they think that he is crazy. In another word, they think that in Sulaimaniyah, there are tanks going around on the streets, and there are American soldiers everywhere going around because they do not understand about this place.

At AUIS, young Kurds, Arabs, Turkmens, Christians, Shiites, and Sunnis have opportunity to meet diplomats and international experts to discuss and debate interesting issues that they had never have in the past. For example on November 24 and 25, 2011 The American University of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS) hosted its first international conference on "Democracy, Liberty, and the New Realities of the Middle East and North Africa" in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. The idea of these events; conferences, panel discussions, workshops, and seminars is a chance for the students to open their minds, to think critically, and to think more deeply about important subjects.

There were some international experts who explained and discussed the concepts of democracy, liberty, and the new transition process in the Middle East such as Larry Diamond, Stanford University on “The Flow and Ebb of Democracy’s Third Wave in the Middle East and North Africa”, Sandy Lakoff, University of California San Diego on “Building Democracy in the Middle East: Opportunities and Obstacles”, Eric Brown, Hudson Institute on “After the Middle Eastern Revolutions: Making Citizens in a Dangerous World”, former U.S. Ambassador in Iraq Christopher R. Hill, University of Denver Korbel School of International Studies on “Iraq’s democratic struggle and what it means for the Middle East and North Africa”, and an essay by John Agresto, former AUIS Provost on “Democracies, Good and Bad” this was presented by a few AUIS International Studies Students.

Athanasios Moulakis, President and Provost of AUIS indicated the importance of the conference for students and the university internationally. “The conference gives our students an opportunity to meet, hear, and discuss with experts of international standing. It also strengthens ties between AUIS and first rate institutions of learning such as Stanford, UCSD, UD and the Hudson Institute and conversely brings AUIS to the attention of a broader international public, thus enhancing its reputation to the benefit of the institution and of its students and graduates, “he said.

Nevertheless, an American journalist told me that would surprise many Americans that there are places in Iraq that are safe enough for such an event to occur, but in fact, what that conference means is that people outside of Iraq, including American people and the American experts can come to Iraq without any concern about the safety at all.

Dlawer Abdul-Aziz Ala'Aldeen, Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) was one of the attendees. He was impressed by students’ participation. “What impressed me most was the finding that the students were actively participating. They were indeed contributing with very innovative ideas, and their questions were reflecting the depth of understanding, and their ability to think independently and argue in an academic way. So, I was very impressed by the display of the students as well as the presenters,” he said.

During the conference, the speakers had a chance to take a tour with the staff of the conference of Sulaimaniyah Museum and the Red Museum to be more familiar with the tragic history of the Kurdish people under Saddam Hussein’s regime. It is really common that places will change over the transition of the authorities. The Red Museum was a place for torturing and killing the Kurdish people, including women and children during Saddam’s regime, and today it is a museum to remind people of the atrocity, ferocity and brutality that happened in the past. Diamond explained the conference and the tour in this way, “It was a very stimulating and instructive conference. The speakers learned a lot from talking to the students and hearing their impressions, their concerns, and their aspirations for Kurdistan. We were particularly moved by the visit to the Amna Suraka Museum (The Red Museum),
www.ekurd.net and to see the horrific documentation of Saddam Hussein's abuses against the Kurdish people. It is important to remember history, and to be reminded about what is at stake in building a free and democratic Iraq.” After the Baath’s devastation, people like Diamond, and his colleagues could come and conclude the panel discussion of the conference in the Red Museum on a subject where the creator of the building originally made a lot of efforts to keep people not to hear the word of democracy.

Lakoff had the most debatable discussions with the students about Islam as an obstacle to democracy, and he faced a lot of questions from the students about this issue. He is also happy with the progress of the region. “I thought it was a really good meeting because it was informative and stimulating for all of us. I especially liked the comments and questions from the students. The topic is very important for all of us so it was good that we started to think about it seriously and critically. The Middle East and North Africa are in a truly historic period of change. We need to try to understand what is happening. And the prospects for liberty and democracy depend on whether the rising generation -- students like yourself -- understand the situation and act wisely and practically and not simply continue to protest. I was also very pleased to see the progress being made at AUIS and in the Kurdish region,” he said.



This article first appeared on upiu.com
                

Thomas Hill teaches AUIS students Peace Building skills


By Salman Ahmed Rasul

                                                      Photo by Noor Aljanabi- AUI-S Voice 
        From left to right: Fahmi Qasem Saied, Sheikh Fuad, Othman Agha Zangana, and Hill discuss the Kirkuk issue.

The Center for Peace and Security Studies sponsored several different events during the last two weeks for Professor of New York University, Thomas Hill: two workshops about peace-building on Jan. 4 and Jan. 11, showing Pray the Devil Back to Hell movie on Jan. 9 and inviting a team of Kirkuk Council of Notables to address and discuss Kirkuk’s issue peacefully on Jan 10.

Hill is a Clinical Assistant Professor at New York University’s Center for Global Affairs, where he teaches peace-building. Hill invited officially by AUIS to be a part of these events.

“I came to AUIS officially for the first time in March 2010 and conducted a workshop that I believe was four days long,” he said.

“It really helped to introduce this idea of peace-building to students here at the university. I do not think it was an idea that most students had known about before. So, that was the primary value of it. I think it was a chance to open their minds to a new subject.”

To keep the idea of peace-building alive in students’ minds Hill decided to have a second workshop and to go deeper. According to what Hill said the workshops gave the a students chance to work more intensively on how the concepts of peace-building can be applied both in their own lives and all the way up to the international level.

“We spent time working on specific skills in peace-building, things like perspective taking, communication and conflict analysis, and really trying to understand them better,” Hill said. “Now, these skills can be put to work in pursuit of peace-building. So, the purpose was to give students the chance to work and think more deeply about the subject. And I was very happy because students came into the university during days that were holidays to do this work with me, and the number of students was not big.

But I felt the students who were there were very energetic and interested in the subject. And actually, by the end of workshop we were taking very much about working to go further to do more.”

About the main purposes of the workshops, Nathaniel L. Rosenblatt, assistant of the research centers said, “The purpose of the events is to expose students to different ideas, theories, and practices in resolving conflicts.” Rosenblatt said the Center for Peace and Security Studies has three main components: national reconciliation, post-conflict reconstruction and the national strategic initiative.

“The reason why we brought Mr. Thomas Hill from the New York University Center for Global Affairs is to be a part of that process,” Rosenblatt added. “His workshops, his panel discussion and the film were all about how you get people who dislike each other very much to start talking to each other, to start working together, to build economic freedom, social freedom, political freedom, and that is what has to happen in this country to normalize.

And how do you get to a point where you are an open and tolerant liberal democracy in a country that has been a dictatorship for thirty years.”

Another part of Hill’s journey at AUIS was addressing the Kirkuk issue by organizing a panel discussion about this matter.

“The panel discussion was intended to give students and others at the university some new knowledge about efforts that are taking place to make peace in Kirkuk,” Hill added.

“Very often people here, even though Kirkuk is not very far away from Sulaimani, people hear only about the violence that happens there.

And so this was really an effort to help students see that actually there are many people in Kirkuk who are working diligently to build peace, and in particular, the Council of Notables which consists of both tribal leaders and other prominent leaders in Kirkuk society from all of the different ethnic groups.

It is trying very hard to intervene and situations where bloodshed might occur, or prevent greater bloodshed than already has occurred. The idea really was to open people’s minds a bit to thinking about the role that community leaders and tribal leaders can play win building peace in Kirkuk and other places.”

“That was my second time taking part in peace building workshops,” Pola Kamal, 23, an academic student, from Kifri. “The more I participate, the more I become committed to

build peace. I participated in the panel discussion. It was an excited event and informed his about the members’ two-edged role in a democratic country.”

“The workshop was a golden opportunity for me, because I learn a great deal about peace building and conflict resolution which is extremely essential for us as Iraqis people, and in a broader sense to the Middle East,” said Shwan Sharey, 23, a junior international studies student, from Sulaimani.

“I hope AUIS will open a field of peace building and conflict resolution studies because according to a Global Peace Index by the Institute of Economics and Peace in 2010, Iraq is the last country which ranks 149, so, AUIS will involve making a better place for all of us. Hill said that it was the second time at AUIS to show a film about peacemaking.

The last movie he showed was about peace building process between Palestine and Israel called Encounter Point. This time the movie was about women peacemakers in Liberia, their efforts to make changes in Liberian government, ending civil war and inter-religious peacemaking because the one of the two women is Muslim and the other one is Christian.

This article first appeared on auisvoice.org 

Several officials will not continue working at AUI-S next year


By Salman Ahmed Rasul

                                                           Photo by Taha Faris- AUI-S Voice
                John Agresto, the provost of AUI-S, holds one of his black pigeons on the roof of the main building
                                                        Joshua Mitchell
                                    
The top two administrators and several other key people at AUI-S will leave this summer. John Agresto, the AUI-S provost, Joshua Mitchell, acting chancellor of the AUI-S, Mary Van Houten, registrar and director of admissions and Ryan Bubalo, deputy director of the English Writing Program and Language Institute, are among those who will leave.
Agresto for the first time in 2005 talked about the AUI-S with Barham Salih, the chairman of the AUI-S Board of Trustees and the prime minister of the KRG. “I was with Dr. Barham in 2005 when we first talked about AUI-S, and he put the Board together.”
Agresto came to the AUI-S in January of 2007. He was at that time not only the provost but also the chancellor. Mitchell came in September 2008.
“I will be here in September and October when you students come back,” Agresto said. “I want to see the new students. I want to see the new faculty. I will probably leave in October or November of 2010.”
Agresto said he would absolutely love to stay in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, but he has a family in the United States, and they cannot come to here to live with him.
“I absolutely love here,” he said. “I love the students. I love the professors and staff. I love the flowers in the yard. I love the gardener. I love everything that is here, but I have a wife at home. I have two daughters at home. I have four grandsons at home, and I love them. too.
So everybody says, do you not love it here at the AUI-S? Of course I do, but do I not love my wife, my children, and my grandchildren? Of course I do. They cannot all come out here with me. They have lives there.”
It was not an easy decision for Agresto to make between two things that he loves the most, he said. “So, I have to make a choice,” he said.
“You will find in your life that sometimes we have to make a choice. We always worry when we have to choose between two bad things. Which one do you choose? I am at the happy position. I have to choose between two good things. Sometimes choosing between two good things is even harder than choosing between two bad things.”
He said that he is going to interview someone to take his position. He thinks that the new person will be fine. He would give up everything he has to the University.
“Every thought I have I have put down here, at AUI-S,” he added. “Every idea I have I have tried to follow. Now it is time to try some people with other ideas to come and build on what I started. The students should look at this positively not negatively.”
He hopes for no major change of policy after he leaves the AUI-S, he said., adding that AUI-S will still be a liberal arts university with a two- year core program. The problem is that all of the all of the officials who are leaving are leaving about at the same time, Agresto said.
“The bad thing is not that I am going, or Dr. Josh is going, or Mary is going, or Ryan is going,” Agresto added. “The bad thing is all of us are going around the same time. That is bad, and I cannot say it is not. This is my biggest worry.”
One of his plans when he goes back to the United States is that he will look at all the pictures that he took with students and faculty.
“In years to come I am going to look at all the pictures I took of students and faculty here in AUI-S, and I wish I were back. I am going to retire. I have a little company that I started a few years ago. I am going to back to my little company. I will still go help people to set up universities.
Joshua Mitchell is another official who will leave the AUI-S. “I will be returning to Georgetown later this summer, where I will resume my teaching in the Department of Government,” he wrote in an e-mail to the Voice.
“My academic home back in the United States is Georgetown University, in Washington, DC. I August 2008 and was granted a Leave of Absence by the President of Georgetown to come to Sulaimani to help build the American University of Iraq – Sulaimani.
A great deal has happened since I arrived. Most importantly, AUI-S is now a vibrant organization, which will survive the departure of any one, or even several, of its senior members.
Even though Mitchell and Agresto are leaving AUI-S, but they will remain involved with AUI-S.
“I will, however, continue to be involved in AUI-S affairs as closely as I can be. This is one of finest educational initiatives in the world, and I am proud to be a part of it,” Mitchell said in the e-mail.
Agresto said he will remain on the Board of Trustees and return once or twice a year.
“So you will see me again,” he said,.“Maybe ,who knows ,you students want me to come back for graduation or something. That would be very nice.”
Mitchell said that they are searching for several positions, including chancellor, provost and rector—which is like a chief administrative officer. But he said, “I would encourage everyone to be patient, and not to worry. AUI-S will go on, with the leadership that it needs.”
Mary Van Houten, registrar and director of admissions, said that her contract is until the end of August, and one of the primer reasons that he makes her leave is her 17-year-old son and her family.
“I promised him I would be in the U.S. in August,” she said. “We are very close. I need to see him. My father recently died. My mother is old. I have a brother. I really like to be close to my mother; she is not very good [about long distance communication]. My father was really good. I used high-tech connection, Skype, and computers, and we e-mailed my mother.”
Ryan Bubalo, deputy director of EWPLI, said he is leaving because his contract is finished.
“Next year I will be at the University of Mississippi in the United States,” Bubalo said. “I have two classes left for my master’s degree. So I am finishing my master’s degree.”

This story first appeared on auisvoice.org 

U.S. embassy scholarships brings diversity to student body


By Salman Ahmed Rasul


14 students from outside of the Kurdish region got full five year scholarship at AUI-S sponsored by U.S.A. Embassy. The previous U.S.A. Ambassador, Christopher Hill, announced in the first MBA graduation ceremony that the U.S.A. embassy would grant $1,000,000 US to provide scholarships for 20 students.

“We awarded 14 scholarships of 20 possible,” said Timothy Doyle, the director of the admissions. “We intend on offering the rest of them next semester. The scholarship recipients are an interesting group. The next semester will be the last time to award the US State Department scholarships.”

This summer the Director of the EWPLI, Rosalind Warfield, and the Assistant to the Research Centers, Nathaniel Rosenblatt, went to Baghdad to evaluate and interview the students.

“Nate and I went to Baghdad on Sep. 28,” said Warfield.

“We interviewed the students on Wednesday and Thursday in the U.S. Embassy in two groups with the Embassy’s representative, Addie Shrader. She is the coordinator of the program for the Embassy.

Forty-five students applied, but only 27 qualified to come and take the test and be interviewed. Two of them had to come to AUI-S for the AEE test, and they both are in the academic pro- gram right now.”

The scholarships were mainly for students from southern Iraq – and therefore mostly Arab students because the U.S. Embassy wants AUI-S to have students from all the regions of Iraq.

“The U.S. State Department has offered a scholarship to incoming students from outside the KRG as an attempt to help diversify AUI-S’ student population,” said Timothy Doyle, director of enrollment and management.

“Their goal is to make our student body as diverse as possible. We have students from different places. We might even get some American students here.

The more different kinds of voices we have, the wider our experience, and the broader our education will be.” said Warfield.

“So, if we want to have a university whose goals are to educate and improve the lives of all Iraqis, then we should be encouraging all Iraqis to apply,” said Rosenblatt. “Now we are in the KRG, so not many people who are in the south of Iraq know about the university.

The goal of the scholarship is to increase the number of people talking about AUI-S outside the KRG.”

Doyle indicated that this is the American university of Iraq-Sulaimani, so it should be for all Iraqis equally. “Although I was not here when the State Department scholarship was offered, I’m speculating that the department thought that they want to help us have AUI-S reflect a wider population of Iraq.

They would do this because we are the American University of Iraq- Sulaimani, and right now we have lots of great Kurdish students, but we can attract even more for other areas,” he said.

“We hope that AUI-S will reflect as much as possible the entire Iraqi people. We do not discriminate, but if generous people wish to assist a limited set of students financially, it is up to them.

We will process their payments, but we don’t seek out sponsors for individual students or groups. If someone--says a student’s grandmother--wishes to pay for her grandchild, we have no problem with that.”

“What we are trying to do is diversify the student body,” said Warfield. “We do not have any way of letting people in the south know that we even existed, except by word of mouth from our students. It is very hard for them to even know we exist, so in this way, the Embassy did all the publicity.”

Polla Kamal, 23, from Kifri, who is an academic student, had distinct perspective about the way the scholarships were offered.

“I strongly disagree with the distinction because there is no reason for depriving the Kurdish students,” Kamal said.

“They are going through the same difficult situation as the Arab students, so both of them are deserve the scholarships. Yes, I agree that diversity is important, but they should use the same standard to judge all of the students equally.

The criteria of selecting should be applied regardless of their ethnicity; otherwise AUI-S stands against its fundamental claims.”

All of the 14 students are so exited for studying at AUI-S, and they think that they have a brighter future at AUI-S.

“I will get a better education here,” said Umniyah Nadhir Mahmood, 18, from Baghdad, and one of the 14 students. “I would like to thank the US embassy in Baghdad and AUI-S. I feel safe to put my future between their hands. I will be ready to serve the US hoping that I can repay them a small part of big help they offered for me.”

“The first reason is that AUI-S is the only university in Iraq which is accredited by the US,” said Baraa Edrees Muhammed, 23, from Samarra who is one of the 14 students.

“Second, there is a high standard of education at AUI-S.

The last reason is AUI-S gives an opportunity to the students to choose their majors. This is why I hope to achieve my goal, which is studying Civil Engineering.”

 List of the name of the students and their level of study:

Umniyah Nadhir Mahmood, Academic

Baraa Edrees Muhammed, Academic

Mohammed Abd Alasady, Level 4

Ahmed Abdul-Ameer Abdul-Hasin, Level 4

 Muhammad Emad Al_Lelo, Level 3

Ansma Mohammed Altan, Level 3

Laith Raed Alessa Level 3

Maad Waleed Hameed Level 3

Nidda Al-den Khalid, Level 2

Haneen Kasim Muhammad Level 2

Noor Saif Qasim Level 2

Wissam Essan Hadi Level 1

Enaas Basim Najim Level 1

Amal Hasin Alwan Level 1

This story first appeared on auisvoice.org 

Rector, provost share leadership responsibilities in absence of president


By Salman Ahmed Rasul
                                                                     Athanasios Moulakis
                                                    Johan Brongers

Unlike last academic year, AUI-S does not have a president or chancellor. Until quite recently, the job opportunity was still on the University’s website; anyone with qualified ability could apply for this position. In the absence of a president, the provost, Athanasios Moulakis, and the rector, Johan Brongers have divided the duties of the position. The provost is in charge of the academic side and the rector leads the administrative side.
“Until we have a president or a chancellor, the rector Mr. Brongers and I share the responsibility normally borne by the chancellor,” said Moulakis.
“Given that we operate without a chancellor to co-ordinate the academic and administrative activities of the University it is especially fortunate that the Rector and I have a very good working relationship.” It is entirely up to the Board of Trustees to hire a president.
“This is a decision that depends on the Board of Trustees,” said Moulakis.“The Board of Trustees has a procedure by which to choose a chancellor or a president. And it is not an easy process because it has to be the right kind of personality. I am sure that the Board has its reasons for having hesitated to make an appointment so far.”
According to the AUI-S Board of Trustees the reason for this issue is that the board’s set the qualification for the president is very high. “The reason of why the Board has not hired a president yet is that we have set the qualifications very high,” said Azzam Alwash, a member of the Board of Trustees, in his e-mail.
“Because we are proud of our University and we want a world class president that will be able to open doors for the University and raise the funds need to lead the University into the future. The search will continue until we find a suitable leader and we will not settle for second best.” “The main reason we have not found a President yet is that we have not found a suitable person and continue looking,” said Kanan Makiya, another member of the Board of Trustees, in his e-mail.
“Our standards are very high, and not many people in the West are willing to relocate under the circumstances. But we will succeed eventually, I am sure. As to when we will succeed that is impossible to answer.”
Not having a president doesn’t stop AUI-S from achieving. Also, the University has achieved so much in the absence of president.
“Without a president, we have been able to continue to expand and recruit facility and open new programs and even get AUI-S accredited in the US, not an easy accomplishment even with a “president” running the show,” said Alwash.
“A properly constructed organization with well trained staff filling key position need not have a “president” to be able to function smoothly and properly. At least that is true in the western world, of which AUI-S is an example.” Alwash indicated that the Board always helps the University, and he elaborated on the provost’s duty toward the University.
“Our provosts are charged with all major issues regarding academics and our board is very active in helping the provosts achieve our goals, build the new campus, raise funds for construction and operations, etc,” he added.
In the meantime, Moulakis and Brongers have a strategic plan for their responsibilities to ensure success for the University without a president.
“We will find a way to identify the right kind of personality in the context of our strategic plan,” Moulakis added. “The rector and I have been developing such a plan that will lay down the main lines of where we are, where we want to be, what it takes to get there and what we want to be. What is necessary in order to be successful? It is a comprehensive plan.
And clearly, this kind of comprehensive plan is best held together by a personality that can also represent our vision to the outside. The plan will also help consolidate what has been achieved already.
A great many admirable things have already been done. We now want to move forward by all of us agreeing what it is we want to do.
One way to put a capstone holds the whole arch of the University together is to have the right chancellor.”

This article first appeared on auisvoice.org